Notifications
Clear all

[Solved] Rolling -10 or less on assessment check

4 Posts
2 Users
0 Likes
1,448 Views
 Fred
(@fred)
Active Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 16
Topic starter  

Hi David,

There appears to be no fatigue applied on a -10 or less roll on an assessment roll.

In the case of our game yesterday, it was better for the French player that he rolled worse (rolled -10 instead of -5 to -9).


   
Quote
David
(@david)
Reputable Member Admin
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 427
 

There appears to be no fatigue applied on a -10 or less roll on an assessment roll.

Correct, though the Formation automatically converts to a Retreat [RT] status, all cavalry and Irregulars [I] are removed, and all artillery batteries retire, but it doesn't take additional fatigue. During development the determination was made that generally, when a Formation has enough negative modifiers going against it that it can get a -10 or higher as an Assessment result, additional fatigue wasn't necessary.

-David


   
ReplyQuote
 Fred
(@fred)
Active Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 16
Topic starter  

The strange thing in our case was that the Bavarian division was going to retreat anyway (it already had sustained enough fatigue). So in this case, rolling the worst result was better then the 2nd worst, as he got no more fatigue.

 


   
ReplyQuote
David
(@david)
Reputable Member Admin
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 427
 

So in this case, rolling the worst result was better then the 2nd worst, as he got no more fatigue.

Sure. We found ourselves trying to strike a balance between how much damage is loaded onto a Formation vs how bad its situation must already be. Compounding this was the fact that we didn't want a Formation to be skirmished or bombarded into Breaking [BK] but did feel there was a point where enough pressure would cause a Retreat [RT] regardless of fatigue.

During development we observed that a -10 might feel anti-climatic, but generally indicated that a Formation was in such a bad situation, it's fate was pretty much sealed.

-David


   
ReplyQuote
Share: